🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test recently following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."