Through Ending a Harsh Tory Welfare Policy, This Budget Clearly Outlines How the Labour Party Will Wage the Struggle to Revitalize Britain

Yesterday, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour Party budget. People have been asking for Labour’s purpose and principles to be more clearly expressed. Through the decisions made – a transition to a fairer tax system, targeting wealth to pay for addressing child poverty, quality public services and the cost of living – we have unequivocally set out what we believe in.

That’s why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the battles to come. And it’s why the cries from the conservative side began immediately.

The Main Dividing Line in UK Politics

The central division in British politics is once again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to reform it so it benefits everyday working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who support the status quo and the unsuccessful ideology of the past. We must now take on, and win, the argument.

The Tories were given 14 years to resolve things and instead, by any measure, they got far more dire. Their doctrinaire austerity and trickle-down economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, reducing investment (causing us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people after the pandemic – proved ineffective.

Record of Decline Under the Previous Administration

Quality of life fell by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages remained flat, a housing crisis took hold, young people affected by Covid were abandoned. The record of failure goes on.

One budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the argument for why our approach will reap dividends.

Social Security and Youth Deprivation

Under the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to deal with the symptoms instead of the solution.

That’s why we are building more social housing than for a generation, raising wages and enhanced protections for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, reducing waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.

Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap

It’s also why we are completely justified to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.

For almost a decade, since it was introduced, poorer families with children have suffered from a cruel social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.

It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, in the end, costs us more, as well as being heartless and immoral.

Real Impact in Communities

From experience from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in cramped, mouldy homes, parents during the holidays depending on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.

I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of deep poverty.

Long-Term Effects of Youth Hardship

Just a quarter of pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among wealthier families. This predisposes them for the challenges they face throughout their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and ill health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.

Confronting child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the three billion pound cost of lifting the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.

This is the reason we acted urgently in the budget, despite the challenging economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 extra children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it will not occur overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was vital.

The cap was a symbol to 14 years of failed rightwing ideology. Now it is abolished.

Equitable Financing for Measures

We, as Labour, can also be explicit that these initiatives are being funded in a fair way – from a new gaming tax, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.

Final Thoughts

Equity and direction – that’s how we will win the battle of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political megaphone and set the agenda more forcefully about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.

So let’s keep hold of it and win this struggle about how we will rebuild Britain and tackle the deep inequalities impeding progress.

Jennifer Jackson
Jennifer Jackson

A seasoned business analyst with over a decade of experience in tech and finance, passionate about data-driven insights and innovation.